Types of Lastnames
1. Generic Hindu first name as last name
Instead of a surname that indicates lineage or acts as a hereditary marker, many Bhumihars use a generic Hindu first name as their last name. This practice mainly started in the late 1980s and continues today. It emerged as a protective measure against caste-based persecution during the period of rampant left-wing extremism (Naxalism/Maoism) in Bihar, when upper-caste men were often targeted after being identified by their Janeu and surnames.
For example, instead of using traditional Bhumihar surnames, names like Raj, Anand, Ranjan, Aditya, Shekhar, etc., which are actually first names, began to be used as last names. As a result, what should conventionally be First name + Last name often becomes First name + First name in the case of many Bhumihars.
2. Titles
Rai, Chaudhary, Thakur, Singh, Sinha, Shahi: These are hereditary titles signifying principal landowner or zamindar status in Bihar, eastern Uttar Pradesh and many other parts of the Indian subcontinent. Some were voluntarily adopted, while others were bestowed upon Bhumihars by various Islamic rulers and, later, sometimes by the British in recognition of their services. These titles were also used by Rajputs of various clans and even by landowning Brahmins throughout North India, especially Maithil Brahmins, among whom the surnames Thakur and Chaudhary are particularly common.
Although these surnames are hereditary and passed down through generations, they do not indicate the bearer’s specific lineage or clan, nor are they exclusive to any particular caste. The surname “Singh,” for example, is first recorded in use by Rudrasimha I (178–197 CE), who was neither a Rajput nor a Sikh, the two groups most commonly associated with it today. Kurmis, Brahmins, Gurjars, Jats, South Indian Kshatriyas, Kayasthas, and Rajputs can all use the suffix “Singh,” despite belonging to entirely different clans. The bottom line is that these titles, though used as surnames and inherited by successive generations, do not reveal the bearer’s actual clan, mool, or lineage. They began as honorific adjectives and have been adopted by many castes across the length and breadth of India.
3. Actual Surnames
These Brahminical surnames are the original surnames of Bhumihars, most of which have now been abandoned. Only a few Bhumihar mools still retain these older surnames. These surnames are both hereditary and indicative of the bearer’s mool, gotra, and lineage. For example, a Bhumihar with the surname Shukla can only belong to the Basmait mool and the Garg gotra. While many Basmait Bhumihars have been using Thakur as their surname for centuries, only the Basmait Bhumihars of Vaishali district in Bihar have not yet abandoned their older Shukla surname.
| Type of last name | Hereditary | Indicates lineage and Mool | Actual family surname | Present usage (remark) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generic Hindu first name as last name | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | Widely used since late 1980s |
| Titles (Rai, Chaudhary, Thakur, Singh…) | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | Still widely used |
| Actual surnames (Shukla, Mishra, etc.) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Mostly abandoned; few retainers |
How to identify if one is Babhan/Bhumihar
Surnames play a very little role in identifying our kin.
Bhumihars are usually identified not by their surnames but by a specific combination of native village, Mool, and Gotra. If all three match the traditionally recognised presence of a particular Bhumihar Mool–Gotra combination in a known Bhumihar village, Block or a region, only then can a person be reliably identified as a Bhumihar (Some surname wise combinations are provided in the Mool-Gotra table in the next section, detailed Mool wise combinations are present on the Mools page).
For example, Bhumihars of the Atharva Mool and Kaundinya gotra are found in and around the Paliganj area of Patna district, as well as parts of Arwal, Jehanabad, and the eastern blocks of Ara. Therefore, if someone claims to be of Sonbhadariya Mool and Kaundinya Gotra from Gorakhpur, this would be an incorrect mool–gotra–region combination and would not be recognised as Bhumihar.
Also, a property of Bhumihar Mools is that for a particular Mool, there can only be one Gotra, but a multiple Mools can share the same Gotra. This is discussed in detail on the Mools page.
Surnames Table
This table below summarizes all the Bhumihar surnames and titles, showing how each relates to Mool, Gotra and their corresponding regions of presence. It distinguishes between given titles, hereditary ancestral surnames, and later adopted forms.
| Surnames | Mool | Usage | Area | Gotra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rai | All Mools | Given title | All Mools residing in the Bhojpuri speaking parts of eastern Gangetic Plains | Gautam, Shandilya, Bhrigu, Kashyap, Vats, Sankritya, Sawarn, Manas |
| Singh | Badramiya | Given surname | Chandauli, Varanasi, Samastipur, Mirzapur | Gautam |
| Thakur | Given title | |||
| Tiwari | ||||
| Chaudhary | Given title | |||
| Shahi | Given title | |||
| Pandey | Ancestral surname | Buxar, Ballia, Ara, Muzaffarpur, Vaishali, Sitamarhi, Samastipur | ||
| Upadhyay | Ancestral surname | |||
| Ojha | Ancestral surname | |||
| Mishra | Chakwar, Sakarwar, Badramiya | Ancestral surname | ||
| Pathak | Ancestral surname | |||
| Shukla | Basmait | Ancestral surname | Vaishali, Muzaffarpur | Garg |
| Mahattha | Ancestral surname | Vishnuvriddhi | ||
| Dubey | Ancestral surname | Buxar, Ballia | ||
| Chaubey | Ancestral surname | |||
| Dikshit | Ancestral surname | Muzaffarpur | Kashyap | |
| Sharma | Adopted | |||
| Sinha | All Mools | Same as Singh |
References
| ID | Book/Article | Author | Year | Snippet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western Provinces and Oudh | William Crooke | 1896 |